Monitorización terapéutica de los fármacos biológicos en la enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal. Documento de Posicionamiento del Grupo Español de Trabajo en Enfermedad de Crohn y Colitis Ulcerosa (GETECCU) / Therapeutic drug monitoring in inflammatory bowel diseases. Position statement of the Spanish Working Group on Crohn's Disease and Ulcerative Colitis

El tratamiento de la enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal (EII) ha sufrido una gran transformación tras la introducción de los fármacos biológicos. Gracias a ellos, los objetivos del tratamiento han evolucionado desde la respuesta y remisión clínica a objetivos más ambiciosos, como la remisión endoscópica o radiológica. Sin embargo, aunque los biológicos son muy eficaces, un porcentaje importante de pacientes no obtendrá una respuesta inicial o la perderá a lo largo del tiempo. Sabemos que existe una relación directa entre las concentraciones valle del biológico y su eficacia terapéutica, que cuanto más exigente sea el objetivo terapéutico serán necesarios niveles superiores del fármaco y que es frecuente la exposición insuficiente al mismo. La monitorización terapéutica de medicamentos biológicos, así como los modelos farmacocinéticos, nos brindan la posibilidad de ofrecer un enfoque personalizado del abordaje en pacientes con EII. Durante los últimos años se ha acumulado información relevante respecto a su utilidad durante o después de la inducción, así como en el mantenimiento del tratamiento biológico, en estrategias reactivas o proactivas y antes de la retirada o desintensificación del esquema.El objetivo de este documento es establecer recomendaciones sobre la utilidad de la monitorización terapéutica de biológicos en pacientes con EII, en los diferentes escenarios de la práctica clínica e identificar las áreas donde su utilidad es evidente, prometedora o controvertida. (AU)

The treatment of inflammatory bowel disease has undergone a significant transformation following the introduction of biologic drugs. Thanks to these drugs, treatment goals have evolved from clinical response and remission to more ambitious objectives, such as endoscopic or radiologic remission. However, even though biologics are highly effective, a significant percentage of patients will not achieve an initial response or may lose it over time. We know that there is a direct relationship between the trough concentrations of the biologic and its therapeutic efficacy, with more demanding therapeutic goals requiring higher drug levels, and inadequate exposure being common.Therapeutic drug monitoring of biologic medications, along with pharmacokinetic models, provides us with the possibility of offering a personalized approach to treatment for patients with IBD. Over the past few years, relevant information has accumulated regarding its utility during or after induction, as well as in the maintenance of biologic treatment, in reactive or proactive strategies, and prior to withdrawal or treatment de-escalation.The aim of this document is to establish recommendations regarding the utility of therapeutic drug monitoring of biologics in patients with inflammatory bowel disease, in different clinical practice scenarios, and to identify areas where its utility is evident, promising, or controversial. (AU)

Therapeutic drug monitoring in inflammatory bowel diseases. Position statement of the Spanish Working Group on Crohn's Disease and Ulcerative Colitis. / Monitorización terapéutica de los fármacos biológicos en la enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal. Documento de Posicionamiento del Grupo Español de Trabajo en Enfermedad de Crohn y Colitis Ulcerosa (GETECCU).

The treatment of inflammatory bowel disease has undergone a significant transformation following the introduction of biologic drugs. Thanks to these drugs, treatment goals have evolved from clinical response and remission to more ambitious objectives, such as endoscopic or radiologic remission. However, even though biologics are highly effective, a significant percentage of patients will not achieve an initial response or may lose it over time. We know that there is a direct relationship between the trough concentrations of the biologic and its therapeutic efficacy, with more demanding therapeutic goals requiring higher drug levels, and inadequate exposure being common. Therapeutic drug monitoring of biologic medications, along with pharmacokinetic models, provides us with the possibility of offering a personalized approach to treatment for patients with IBD. Over the past few years, relevant information has accumulated regarding its utility during or after induction, as well as in the maintenance of biologic treatment, in reactive or proactive strategies, and prior to withdrawal or treatment de-escalation. The aim of this document is to establish recommendations regarding the utility of therapeutic drug monitoring of biologics in patients with inflammatory bowel disease, in different clinical practice scenarios, and to identify areas where its utility is evident, promising, or controversial.

Unusual presentation of biliopancreatic cancer as primary retroperitoneal tumor.

Primary retroperitoneal tumors are little-known neoplasias and consequently, difficult to diagnose. We report an extremely unusual case of a biliopancreatic adenocarcinoma with retroperitoneal localization simulating a primary retroperitoneal tumor. As far as we know, there are no similar cases published up to date.

Performance of a New Rapid Point-of-Care Test for Infliximab Levels in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Comparison to ELISA.

BACKGROUND: Therapeutic drug monitoring of infliximab levels in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) optimizes patients' treatment. The reference technique is based on enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) although point of care (POC) assays are being developed. AIMS: To assess the performance of a new rapid immunochromatographic POC assay (Promonitor Quick IFX) compared with ELISA technique to measure infliximab levels in patients with IBD. METHODS: A prospective, observational, unicentric study was performed on capillary blood samples from patients with IBD before infliximab infusion (trough levels). Infliximab levels and anti-infliximab antibodies were measured using the ELISA technique (Promonitor IFX) and the POC assay. Correlation between both techniques was assessed by Pearson's coefficient. Quantitative differences were evaluated by Bland-Altman analysis. Samples were stratified according to infliximab therapeutic ranges (< 3 µg/mL, 3-8 µg/mL, and > 8 µg/mL). RESULTS: A total of 135 experimental samples were assessed. Infliximab levels showed a high correlation between POC and ELISA tests (r = 0.84, P < 0.001). The mean difference between tests was 1.46 µg/mL (P < 0.001), being minimal for concentrations < 8 µg/mL. POC and ELISA assays showed an overall concordance of 87.4%. Most samples were in the same therapeutic range, which lead to equivalent therapeutic decisions. POC and ELISA assays detected the presence of anti-infliximab antibodies in 2.2% and 3.7% of the samples, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: POC assay results in blood samples from patients with IBD were comparable to those obtained with the reference ELISA technique. The POC assay could be considered for routine testing based on its ease of use and rapidity.

Unusual presentation of jejunal adenocarcinoma and ovarian metastasis.

It is rare to find a small bowel tumour presenting as intestinal obstruction. This type of cancer is an extremely unusual condition often misdiagnosed until late stages. We report the case of a patient with persistent vomiting secondary to an obstructing jejunal adenocarcinoma not related to intestinal bowel disease. After resection and chemotherapy treatment a huge mass was detected in the left ovary. The anatomopathological findings confirmed a metastatic cancer consequent to the jejunal adenocarcinoma previously resected. This case illustrates a successful outcome of a jejunal adenocarcinoma with very poor prognosis after a extremely unusual ovarian metastasis. It is highly important to suspect other causes than intestinal bowel disease when doing a differential diagnosis in a young patient presenting with clinical symptoms of intestinal obstruction.

Unusual presentation of jejunal adenocarcinoma and ovarian metastasis

It is rare to find a small bowel tumour presenting as intestinal obstruction. This type of cancer is an extremely unusual condition often misdiagnosed until late stages. We report the case of a patient with persistent vomiting secondary to an obstructing jejunal adenocarcinoma not related to intestinal bowel disease. After resection and chemotherapy treatment a huge mass was detected in the left ovary. The anatomopathological findings confirmed a metastatic cancer consequent to the jejunal adenocarcinoma previously resected. This case illustrates a successful outcome of a jejunal adenocarcinoma with very poor prognosis after a extremely unusual ovarian metastasis. It is highly important to suspect other causes than intestinal bowel disease when doing a differential diagnosis in a young patient presenting with clinical symptoms of intestinal obstruction. (AU)

Optimización del tratamiento de la colitis ulcerosa leve a moderada: Consenso Delphi CU-Forum / Optimizing treatment of mild to moderate ulcerative colitis: CU-forum Delphi consensus

Antecedentes y objetivo: Las guías clínicas de colitis ulcerosa (CU) recogen la mejor evidencia disponible, aunque no todas las situaciones clínicas quedan respondidas, por lo que su manejo puede ser motivo de controversia. El objetivo de este estudio es identificar las situaciones de la CU leve a moderada susceptibles de controversia y evaluar el grado de acuerdo o desacuerdo a propuestas concretas. Métodos: Mediante reuniones de debate de expertos en enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal (EII) se identificaron criterios, actitudes y opiniones respecto al manejo de la CU. A continuación se elaboró un cuestionario Delphi con 60 aseveraciones relativas a antibióticos, salicilatos y probióticos, corticoides locales, sistémicos y tópicos e inmunosupresores. Resultados: Se alcanzó consenso en 44 aseveraciones (73,3%); 32 en el acuerdo (53,3%) y 12 en el desacuerdo (20,0%). Algunos de ellos fueron: no es necesario el uso sistemático de antibióticos a pesar de la gravedad del brote, quedando reservados ante la sospecha de infección o toxicidad sistémica; ante un brote leve-moderado de CU y en pacientes que no responden a aminosalicilatos es adecuado utilizar una dosis de beclometasona de 10mg/día durante un mes y 5mg/día durante otro mes; se aconseja que la dosis de azatioprina se administre en una única dosis. Conclusiones: Los expertos en EII coinciden en la mayoría de las propuestas identificadas para manejar la CU leve a moderada y se constata la necesidad de evidencia científica en algunas situaciones concretas en las que conocer la opinión de expertos puede resultar de ayuda. (AU)

Background and objective: Ulcerative colitis (UC) clinical guidelines include the best available evidence, although not all clinical situations are answered, so their management can be controversial. The aim of this study is to identify the situations of mild to moderate UC susceptible to controversy and to evaluate the degree of agreement or disagreement with specific proposals. Methods: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) expert discussion meetings were used to identify criteria, attitudes and opinions regarding the management of UC. A Delphi questionnaire was then developed with 60 items regarding antibiotics, salicylates and probiotics; local, systemic and topical corticosteroids; and immunosuppressants. Results: Consensus was reached in 44 statements (73.3%); 32 in agreement (53.3%) and 12 in disagreement (20.0%). Some of them were: it is not necessary the systematic use of antibiotics despite the severity of the outbreak, being reserved when there is suspicion of infection or systemic toxicity; when faced with a mild-moderate outbreak of UC and in patients who do not respond to aminosalicylates, it is appropriate to use a dose of beclomethasone of 10mg/day for one month and 5mg/day for another month; it is advised that the dose of azathioprine be administered in a single dose. Conclusions: IBD experts agree on most of the proposals identified for managing mild to moderate UC and there is a need for scientific evidence in some specific situations where expert opinion may be helpful. (AU)

ffectiveness and safety of ustekinumab dose escalation in Crohn’s disease: a multicenter observational study / Efectividad y seguridad del aumento de dosis de ustekinumab en la enfermedad de Crohn: un estudio observacional multicéntrico

Background: ustekinumab has proven effective in Crohn’s disease (CD). However, some patients will partially respond or lose response over time. Data supporting the effectiveness of dose escalation in this scenario is scarce. Aim: to evaluate the effectiveness of ustekinumab dose escalation in CD. Methods: patients with active CD (Harvey-Bradshaw ≥ 5) who had received intravenous (IV) induction and at least a subcutaneous (SC) dose were included in this retrospective observational study. Ustekinumab dose was escalated, either via shortening of the interval to six or four weeks or IV reinduction plus shortening to every four weeks. Results: ninety-one patients were included, and ustekinumab dose was escalated after a median of 35 weeks of treatment. At week 16 after intensification, steroid-free clinical response and remission were observed in 62.6 % and 25.3 % of patients, respectively. Systemic corticosteroids were discontinued in 46.7 % of patients who were on corticosteroids at baseline. Follow-up data beyond week 16 were available for 78 % of patients; at the last visit, 66.2 % and 43.7 % were in steroid-free clinical response and remission, respectively. After a median follow-up of 64 weeks, 81 % of patients were still treated with ustekinumab. Adverse events were reported in 4.3 % of patients; these were all mild and did not lead to hospitalization or discontinuation of treatment. Five patients (5.5 %) underwent surgical resection, with no immediate postsurgical complications. Conclusion: ustekinumab dose escalation was effective in recapturing response in over half of the patients. These findings suggest that dose escalation should be considered in patients who experience loss or partial response to the standard maintenance.(AU)

Intravenous ustekinumab maintenance treatment in patients with loss of response to subcutaneous dosing.

Background: Ustekinumab (UST) is indicated for the treatment of Crohn's disease (CD) and Ulcerative Colitis (UC). Despite having shown clinical effectiveness in the real world, some patients may lose response over time or need a higher dose to achieve it. In this context, UST intravenous (IV) maintenance has been proposed. Objectives: The primary endpoint of our study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of maintenance IV UST treatment in Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) patients who present with partial response or loss of response to subcutaneous (SC) UST. Design: We performed a monocentric observational retrospective study including patients with active IBD on maintenance treatment with IV UST. Methods: The clinical response and remission was analyzed at week 12, defined as either Harvey-Bradshaw Index ⩽ 4 for CD or partial Mayo Score ⩽ 2 for UC. The reduction of objective markers of disease activity, fecal calprotectin, and C-reactive protein was evaluated. Moreover, UST trough levels were measured pre- and post-UST IV maintenance and any adverse events were assessed. Results: We included 23 patients. Clinical remission at week 12 was achieved by 43.5% of the patients. The proportion of patients in clinical response after 12 weeks on UST IV maintenance was 82.6%. After a median follow-up of 9.3 months all patients remained on IV UST maintenance. No adverse events were recorded in any patient for the duration of the study. Conclusions: IV UST maintenance treatment was able to recapture response in most of the patients who had lost response to SC maintenance.

Safe use of proton-pump inhibitors

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are one of the most commonly prescribed drug groups in developed countries. Their approved indications include gastroesophageal reflux disease, peptic ulcer disease, and prophylaxis against NSAID-induced gastroenteropathy in specific scenarios. Since their introduction into clinical practice, their usage has significantly increased, leading to concerns about possible inappropriate prescribing, which can result in a higher risk of side effects and increased economic costs. Consequently, in recent years, literature linking PPIs to various adverse effects has emerged, with some supported by robust evidence, while others are based on lower-quality evidence, requiring cautious interpretation. Among the adverse effects of PPIs, significant ones include an increased risk of fragility fractures, deficiencies in certain micronutrients such as vitamin B12 and magnesium, a higher incidence of enteric infections, especially Clostridioides difficile, complications in cirrhotic patients, and pharmacological interactions with other medications. In clinical practice, it is essential to periodically evaluate the rationale for prescribing these drugs and consider discontinuing them if there is no appropriate indication. Despite PPIs being generally safe medications, it is crucial to be aware of their potential adverse effects and appropriate indications to ensure their proper use. (AU)

Pancreatic intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm evolving into adenocarcinoma. Continual follow-up necessary.

We report a 62-year-old female with chronic pancreatitis after three episodes of severe acute pancreatitis. In 2008, an uneven main pancreatic duct (MPD) of 16 mm was found during an abdominal ultrasound. The follow-up was not continued until 2020, when a dilation of 27 mm of the MPD was discovered at magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). In 2022, another radiological test was carried out showing a dilation of the MPD of 40 mm with an intraductal tumoral lesion of 30 mm at the head of the pancreas). An echo-endoscopy was carried out and a pancreatic-duodenal tumour with a mixed pattern was discovered. Atypic cells were observed at the fine needle punction. A total duodenopancreatectomy was successfully carried out. In the anatomopathological macroscopic study a 14 cm-multi-cystic neoformation was seen and a solid tumour was discovered at the head of the pancreas that infiltrated the wall of the duodenum. In the longitudinal cross-section of the pancreatic body the MPD was seen to be severely dilated. A focal adenocarcinoma in a intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) was finally diagnosed. Pancreatic lesions are usually asymptomatic and are detected by chance during other imaging tests. The IPMN rates of malignancy have been reported of between 19 to 30%. The management of pancreatic cystic lesions still represents a clinical challenge. As always, the multi-disciplinary management is mandatory in this type of tumour.

Safe use of proton-pump inhibitors.

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are one of the most commonly prescribed drug groups in developed countries. Their approved indications include gastroesophageal reflux disease, peptic ulcer disease, and prophylaxis against NSAID-induced gastroenteropathy in specific scenarios. Since their introduction into clinical practice, their usage has significantly increased, leading to concerns about possible inappropriate prescribing, which can result in a higher risk of side effects and increased economic costs. Consequently, in recent years, literature linking PPIs to various adverse effects has emerged, with some supported by robust evidence, while others are based on lower-quality evidence, requiring cautious interpretation. Among the adverse effects of PPIs, significant ones include an increased risk of fragility fractures, deficiencies in certain micronutrients such as vitamin B12 and magnesium, a higher incidence of enteric infections, especially Clostridioides difficile, complications in cirrhotic patients, and pharmacological interactions with other medications. In clinical practice, it is essential to periodically evaluate the rationale for prescribing these drugs and consider discontinuing them if there is no appropriate indication. Despite PPIs being generally safe medications, it is crucial to be aware of their potential adverse effects and appropriate indications to ensure their proper use.

The HLA-DQA1*05 genotype does not influence the clinical response to ustekinumab and vedolizumab.

BACKGROUND: the success of strategies with earlier anti-TNF drugs for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have been shadowed by the development of anti-drug antibodies that reduce their effectiveness. The HLA-DQA1*05 allele has been shown to increase the risk of immunogenicity to anti-TNF drugs by approximately two-fold. The negative impact of this allele has not been fully investigated for newer biotherapies. OBJECTIVE: whether the presence of the HLA-DQA1*05 allele is associated with a reduction of response to ustekinumab and vedolizumab was investigated. MATERIAL AND METHODS: the impact of HLA-DQA1*05 on disease activity in 93 patients with IBD, treated with ustekinumab (n = 39) or vedolizumab (n = 54) was investigated in a retrospective cohort study. Treatment response and remission was assessed at 6 and 12 months for ustekinumab, and up to 18 and 24 months for vedolizumab, using Harvey-Bradshaw index (Crohn's disease) and Mayo score (ulcerative colitis). RESULTS: the HLA-DQA1*05 allele was found in 35.9 % and 38.9 % of patients treated with ustekinumab and vedolizumab, respectively. Clinical response was not affected by the presence of the HLA-DQA1*05 allele for both treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: in contrast to anti-TNF drugs, HLA-DQA1*05 presence does not correlate with the decreased response to ustekinumab or vedolizumab.

Effectiveness and safety of ustekinumab dose escalation in Crohn's disease: a multicenter observational study.

BACKGROUND: ustekinumab has proven effective in Crohn's disease (CD). However, some patients will partially respond or lose response over time. Data supporting the effectiveness of dose escalation in this scenario is scarce. AIM: to evaluate the effectiveness of ustekinumab dose escalation in CD. METHODS: patients with active CD (Harvey-Bradshaw ≥ 5) who had received intravenous (IV) induction and at least a subcutaneous (SC) dose were included in this retrospective observational study. Ustekinumab dose was escalated, either via shortening of the interval to six or four weeks or IV reinduction plus shortening to every four weeks. RESULTS: ninety-one patients were included, and ustekinumab dose was escalated after a median of 35 weeks of treatment. At week 16 after intensification, steroid-free clinical response and remission were observed in 62.6 % and 25.3 % of patients, respectively. Systemic corticosteroids were discontinued in 46.7 % of patients who were on corticosteroids at baseline. Follow-up data beyond week 16 were available for 78 % of patients; at the last visit, 66.2 % and 43.7 % were in steroid-free clinical response and remission, respectively. After a median follow-up of 64 weeks, 81 % of patients were still treated with ustekinumab. Adverse events were reported in 4.3 % of patients; these were all mild and did not lead to hospitalization or discontinuation of treatment. Five patients (5.5 %) underwent surgical resection, with no immediate postsurgical complications. CONCLUSION: ustekinumab dose escalation was effective in recapturing response in over half of the patients. These findings suggest that dose escalation should be considered in patients who experience loss or partial response to the standard maintenance.

Clinical utility of urinary gluten immunogenic peptides in the follow-up of patients with coeliac disease.

BACKGROUND: Gluten-free diet (GFD) is the only treatment for patients with coeliac disease (CD) and its compliance should be monitored to avoid cumulative damage. AIMS: To analyse gluten exposures of coeliac patients on GFD for at least 24 months using different monitoring tools and its impact on duodenal histology at 12-month follow-up and evaluate the interval of determination of urinary gluten immunogenic peptides (u-GIP) for the monitoring of GFD adherence. METHODS: Ninety-four patients with CD on a GFD for at least 24 months were prospectively included. Symptoms, serology, CDAT questionnaire, and u-GIP (three samples/visit) were analysed at inclusion, 3, 6, and 12 months. Duodenal biopsy was performed at inclusion and 12 months. RESULTS: At inclusion, 25.8% presented duodenal mucosal damage; at 12 months, this percentage reduced by half. This histological improvement was indicated by a reduction in u-GIP but did not correlate with the remaining tools. The determination of u-GIP detected a higher number of transgressions than serology, regardless of histological evolution type. The presence of >4 u-GIP-positive samples out of 12 collected during 12 months predicted histological lesion with a specificity of 93%. Most patients (94%) with negative u-GIP in ≥2 follow-up visits showed the absence of histological lesions (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: This study suggests that the frequency of recurrent gluten exposures, according to serial determination of u-GIP, could be related to the persistence of villous atrophy and that a more regular follow-up every 6 months, instead of annually, provides more useful data about the adequate adherence to GFD and mucosal healing.

Severe outbreak of ulcerative colitis and cerebral neoplasia. Difficult management in COVID time.

A 61-year-old male diabetic patient, diagnosed with ulcerative colitis (UC) 30 years ago, currently under treatment with mesalazine is presented. He was admitted to the emergency department due to a severe outbreak of UC, with 15 depositions daily, rectal bleeding and poor general condition. A brain CT-scan was carried out in the emergency department due to a sudden self-limited aphasia. A left frontal lesion of 45x38 mms with a prominent perilesional edema and with a displacement of the midline was reported. This was believed to be a meningioma (figure 1A). Urgent neurosurgery was not performed, prioritizing the severe flare-up UC. Based on this, full-dose metilprednisolone was administered.

Optimizing treatment of mild to moderate ulcerative colitis: CU-forum Delphi consensus. / Optimización del tratamiento de la colitis ulcerosa leve a moderada: Consenso Delphi CU-Forum.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Ulcerative colitis (UC) clinical guidelines include the best available evidence, although not all clinical situations are answered, so their management can be controversial. The aim of this study is to identify the situations of mild to moderate UC susceptible to controversy and to evaluate the degree of agreement or disagreement with specific proposals. METHODS: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) expert discussion meetings were used to identify criteria, attitudes and opinions regarding the management of UC. A Delphi questionnaire was then developed with 60 items regarding antibiotics, salicylates and probiotics; local, systemic and topical corticosteroids; and immunosuppressants. RESULTS: Consensus was reached in 44 statements (73.3%); 32 in agreement (53.3%) and 12 in disagreement (20.0%). Some of them were: it is not necessary the systematic use of antibiotics despite the severity of the outbreak, being reserved when there is suspicion of infection or systemic toxicity; when faced with a mild-moderate outbreak of UC and in patients who do not respond to aminosalicylates, it is appropriate to use a dose of beclomethasone of 10mg/day for one month and 5mg/day for another month; it is advised that the dose of azathioprine be administered in a single dose. CONCLUSIONS: IBD experts agree on most of the proposals identified for managing mild to moderate UC and there is a need for scientific evidence in some specific situations where expert opinion may be helpful.

Perianal Paget's disease.

The incidence of extramammary Paget's disease (EMPD) is very low. It is very important to distinguish between primary Paget's disease and secondary to another process. An 85-year-old man consulted for the presence of an erythematous plaque located in the anal and gluteal area, confirming Paget cells in the biopsy.

Effects of polyphenolic maqui (Aristotelia chilensis) extract on the inhibition of NLRP3 inflammasome and activation of mast cells in a mouse model of Crohn's disease-like colitis.

Introduction: Crohn's disease (CD) involves activation of mast cells (MC) and NF-кB in parallel with the PPAR-α/NLRP3 inflammasome/IL-1ß pathway in the inflamed colon. Whether polyphenols from maqui (Aristotelia chilensis) represent a natural alternative treatment for CD is unclear. Therefore, we used an animal model of 2,4,6-trinitrobenzene sulfonic acid (TNBS)-induced CD-like colitis to investigate protective effects of maqui extract through monitoring NLRP3 inflammasome and MC activation in colon tissue. Methods: Maqui extract was administered via orogastric route to mice after (post-Treatment group) or prior (pre-Treatment group) to TNBS-induction. Colon pathology was characterized by histoarchitectural imaging, disease activity index (DAI), and assessing NF-кB, p-NF-кB, PPAR-α/NLRP3 expression and IL-1ß levels. Results: Compared to mice treated with TNBS alone administration of anthocyanin-rich maqui extract improved the DAI, colon histoarchitecture and reduced both colon wet-weight and transmural inflammation. Induction with TNBS significantly increased colonic NLPR3 inflammasome activation, while co-treatment with maqui extract (either post- or pre-Treatment) significantly downregulated NLRP3, ASC and caspase-1 levels, which manifested as reduced colonic IL-1ß levels. Supplemented maqui extract marginally diminished NF-кB activity in epithelial cells but reached statistical significance in immune cells (as judged by decreased NF-кB phosphorylation). PPAR-α signaling was largely unaffected by Maqui whereas MC infiltration into the colon mucosa and submucosa decreased and their level of degranulation was suppressed. Conclusion: These outcomes show the post- and pre- Treatment effect of a polyphenolic extract rich in anthocyanins from maqui the acute phase of TNBS- induced CD-like colitis is linked to suppression of the NLRP3 inflammasome and reduced MC responses. These data indicate that maqui extract represents a potential nutraceutical for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).